When Nicholson Baker, one of the most linguistically talented writers in America, set out to write a book about John Updike, the result was no ordinary biography. Instead Baker's account of his relationship with his hero is a hilarious story of ambition, obsession, talent and neurosis, alternately self-deprecating and self-aggrandizing. More ...
When Nicholson Baker, one of the most linguistically talented writers in America, set out to write a book about John Updike, the result was no ordinary biography. Instead Baker's account of his relationship with his hero is a hilarious story of ambition, obsession, talent and neurosis, alternately self-deprecating and self-aggrandizing. More memoir than literary criticism, Baker is excruciatingly honest, and U & I reveals at least as much about Baker himself as it does about his idol. Written twenty years before Updike's death in 2009, U & I is a very smart and extremely funny exploration of the debts we owe our heroes.
Publishers Weekly, 1992-01-27 Baker ponders novelist John Updike in this alternately self-deprecating and self-aggrandizing essay. (Feb.)
Publishers Weekly, 1991-03-08 This expansive already used `wide-ranging'.aa essay recounts how the novelist John Updike (the ``U'' of the title) has wielded an uncanny influence on fellow novelist Baker ( The Mezzanine ). Baker calls the genre here ``memory criticism,'' a form that ``relies entirely on what has survived in a reader's mind from a particular writer over at least ten gs years of spotty perusal.'' Alternately self-deprecating (``What's he Baker done that is so good that he thinks he can freely criticize Updike?'') and self-aggrandizing ( ``Do you think I'm a better writer than Updike?'' since you say he's talking to his wife, I'm not sure if double quotes are needed. aa Baker asks his future wife), the book presents a telling portrait of a working writer and critic. This is not a primitive, adulatory dialogue with the oeuvreok? of a lofty father figure; rather, it is a quivering ``imaginary friendship'' with living literary kin. Like all good essays, these are full of fertile tangential thoughts, as in Baker's delineation of one of the ``risks'' that he believes is implicit in memory criticism: ``It depends to an unusual extent on whether you the reader like me.'' Such thoughts stay in the mind long after annoyingly arch self-commentary--``my entire buttock region, as day-glo-sic colored as a baboon's''--has been and gone. First serial to the Atlantic; author tour. (Apr.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Copyright in bibliographic data and cover images is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited, Baker & Taylor, Inc., or by their respective licensors, or by the publishers, or by their respective licensors. For personal use only. All rights reserved. All rights in images of books or other publications are reserved by the original copyright holders.